Neonicitinoid Question

[Max Morgan]

I have a local seasonal pumpkin patch farmer who is willing to let me keep some in-town hives; however, he irrigates (i.e. not sprayed) just ONE TIME ONLY with a neonicitinoid. My question is this: If I seal up my bees the day of the irrigation application and let them out only after the irrigation water has completely soaked in, will the insecticide still contaminate the pollen and be deadly to my bees?

[susan rudnicki]

Mr Morgan—this is a excerpt of a letter I sent to the head of Armstrong Garden Centers, a outfit putting soil drenches on their flowering plants and trees prior to shipping from the growers. Neonics can be very persistent in the tissues of treated plants—we are talking years.

———————————–
…..research information is flawed if it is failing to explain that systemics (soil drenches of imidicloprid and the like) do not transfer the active ingredient to the pollen, nectar, and water exudate that often is collected by foraging bees from plants as a source of water for use in the hive.
The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation has researched and documented this angle of neonicotinoid usage and the group has no ax to grind for profit motives. Please read this file—-
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CFQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.step-project.net%2Ffiles%2FDOWNLOAD2%2FAre-Neonicotinoids-Killing-Bees_Xerces-Society1.pdf&ei=veT6UpD6M8XBqAG28ICgDA&usg=AFQjCNHJ_r7Z2MCyOaia6cxMF5WI_l56jw&sig2=qP3Ddhuh_KmTWuHjfVMLeA&bvm=bv.61190604,d.aWM

Also, below is some very troubling late research to add to your knowledge base. It goes to the heart of the inadequacies and scientific modeling that have been exploited by chemical companies and agriculture to insist there is little to worry about. In fact, the general formula that would test ONLY the adult bee response, not that of the brood, sounds very much like the same fatal flaws of toxicological research that fails to address the ill effects of hormone mimickers, fire retardants, plastics, coatings, paints and a plethora of other background chemicals encountered by children and their developing immune, neurological, and hormone systems.

This ezine is also available online at http://home.ezezine.com/1636/1636-2014.01.28.08.18.archive.html

CATCH THE BUZZ

Miticides, Ag Chems and Inert Ingredients A Deadly Mix In A Beehive.

Alan Harman

Disturbing new research finds four pesticides commonly used to kill mites, insects and fungi – fluvalinate, coumaphos, chlorothalonil and chlorpyrifos – are also killing honey bee larvae within their hives.

A team from Penn State and University of Florida also found that N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) – an inert, or inactive, chemical commonly used as a pesticide additive — is highly toxic to honey bee larvae.

“We found that four of the pesticides most commonly found in beehives kill bee larvae,” says Penn State’s Jim Frazier. “We also found that the negative effects of these pesticides are sometimes greater when the pesticides occur in combinations within the hive.

“Since pesticide safety is judged almost entirely on adult honey bee sensitivity to individual pesticides and also does not consider mixtures of pesticides, the risk assessment process that the Environmental Protection Agency uses should be changed.”

The research was funded by the National Honey Board, the U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Institute of Food and Agriculture-Agriculture and Food Research Initiative-Coordinated Agricultural Projects and the Foundational Award programs. Frazier says the team’s previous research demonstrated that forager bees bring back to the hive an average of six different pesticides on the pollen they collect. Nurse bees use this pollen to make beebread, which they then feed to honey bee larvae.

To examine the effects of four common pesticides – fluvalinate, coumaphos, chlorothalonil and chlorpyrifos – on bee larvae, the researchers reared honey bee larvae in their laboratory. They then applied the pesticides alone and in all combinations to the beebread to determine whether these insecticides and fungicides act alone or in concert to create a toxic environment for honey bee growth and development.

The researchers also investigated the effects of NMP on honey bee larvae by adding seven concentrations of the chemical to a pollen-derived, royal jelly diet. NMP is used to dissolve pesticides into formulations that then allow the active ingredients to spread and penetrate the plant or animal surfaces onto which they are applied.

The team fed their treated diet, containing various types and concentrations of chemicals, to the laboratory-raised bee larvae.

“We found that mixtures of pesticides can have greater consequences for larval toxicity than one would expect from individual pesticides,” Frazier says.

Among the four pesticides, honey bee larvae were most sensitive to chlorothalonil. They also were negatively affected by a mixture of chlorothalonil with fluvalinate. In addition, the larvae were sensitive to the combination of chlorothalonil with the miticide coumaphos.

In contrast, the addition of coumaphos significantly reduced the toxicity of the fluvalinate and chlorothalonil mixture.

Penn State professor of entomology Chris Mullin says the pesticides may directly poison honey bee larvae or they may indirectly kill them by disrupting the beneficial fungi that are essential for nurse bees to process pollen into beebread.

“Chronic exposure to pesticides during the early life stage of honey bees may contribute to their inadequate nutrition or direct poisoning with a resulting impact on their survival and development,” he says.

The researchers note that fluvalinate and coumaphos are commonly used by beekeepers in their hives to control Varroa mites, and are found to persist within beehives for about five years if not removed by beekeepers.

Chlorothalonil is a broad-spectrum agricultural fungicide that is often applied to crops in bloom when honey bees are present for pollination because it is currently deemed safe to bees. Chlorpyrifos is a widely used organophosphate in crop management.

“Our findings suggest that the common pesticides chlorothalonil, fluvalinate, coumaphos and chlorpyrifos, individually or in mixtures, have statistically significant impacts on honey bee larval survivorship,” Mullin says.

“This is the first study to report serious toxic effects on developing honey bee larvae of dietary pesticides at concentrations that currently occur in hives.”

The team also found that increasing amounts of NMP corresponded to increased larval mortality, even at the lowest concentration tested.

“There is a growing body of research that has reported a wide range of adverse effects of inactive ingredients to human health, including enhancing pesticide toxicities across the nervous, cardiovascular, respiratory and hormone systems,” Mullin says.

“The bulk of synthetic organic chemicals used and released into U.S. environments are formulation ingredients like NMP, which are generally recognized as safe. They have no mandated limits on their use and their residues remain unmonitored.

“Multi-billion pounds of these inactive ingredients overwhelm the total chemical burden from the active pesticide, drug and personal-care ingredients with which they are formulated. Among these co-formulants are surfactants and solvents of known high toxicity to fish, amphibians, honey bees and other non-target organisms. While we have found that NMP contributes to honey bee larvae mortality, the overall role of these inactive ingredients in pollinator decline remains to be determined.”

——————————————–

The entire concept of the “generally recognized as safe” is a grab-bag of grandfathered in give aways to the chemical companies by our United States Congress. There is a dark and corrupt history to that issue that I won’t go into here, as it is very involved, but it amounts to the chemical industry not having to PROVE their products cause no harm BEFORE introduction, but the burden of the proof lies with injured parties later down the road having to prove they have been harmed—a much more difficult and expensive proposition.

As you may guess, your letter does not bring me much comfort. This sentence—“supply home gardeners with the products needed to be successful.” —-begs the observation— in a pursuit that is inextricably tied to the abundance, diversity, and intricacy of Nature—the notion of “successful” being a perfect, blemish free, controlled Nature is inherently hypocritical. So many organisms—birds, reptiles, mammals, other arthropods— rely on the very “bugs” that “success” seeks to annihilate and commerce is so avid to encourage the public to want such a situation. I had to laugh ruefully at the little mechanical butterfly toy, going in circles ’round a potted plant at the checkout counter in the Torrance store. That is just the sort of ‘acceptable’ insect that we may be left with if we keep on the trajectory we have been treading the last few decades.

I hope you pass this information on to the rest of the group. If you are only a businessman, you may not be able to process the biological significance of what I am writing you. These issues are technically arcane but the fact remains, only the blind insist we are not messing with fundamental processes we barely understand.

Sincerely, Susan Rudnicki, beekeeper and gardener, Manhattan Beach CA

[Author]

Posts